“Proof beyond a reasonable doubt” is proof of such character that an ordinary person would be willing to rely and act upon it in the most important of the person’s own affairs.įor a Criminal Conviction, the Prosecution Must Prove Every Element Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Reasonable doubt is not mere possible doubt, because everything relating to human affairs or depending on moral evidence is open to some possible or imaginary doubt. It is a doubt based on reason and common sense. “Reasonable doubt” is present when the jurors, after they have carefully considered and compared all evidence, cannot say that they are firmly convinced of the truth of the charge. In ORC 2901.05 Burden of proof – reasonable doubt – self-defense, reasonable doubt is defined:
Securing a criminal conviction requires that the state prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, and Ohio law describes that standard in greater detail. However, most people are a bit less clear about exactly what “beyond a reasonable doubt” means, how it is applied in a criminal proceeding, and when a jury must make that determination. You’ve undoubtedly heard that a person charged with a crime can be convicted only if the judge or jury is persuaded that he or she is guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Even those who have never been charged with a crime or involved in the judicial process are familiar with that phrase, whether from high school civics class or a favorite television show.
0 kommentar(er)
